by Blemished on Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:00 am
A couple of things struck me from this - and thanks for posting details Simon:
The reference to the visual aspect of the tour. I wonder if there might be any projections / backdrops similar to those used in the Blemish tour? I thought they added a huge amount to the atmosphere of those concerts.
Also, his mention of the physical and psychological toll of Manafon. I'm not sure I'd ever considered this, given that the lyrics appear impersonal and improvised and that the music was edited from improvs.
But the more I think about this it makes me appreciate just how hard it must have been to marshall so many elements of often unpitched sound and noises into the framework of song and melody. I've been listening a lot to various Erstwhile CDs recently and, while I find that sound world increasingly essential, translating it to song is a daunting prospect.
*** Ramble alert! ***
It also led to me think about how 'Manafon' is in some ways a distant, but related, cousin of Tin Drum. For the latter, there were song frameworks that were then deconstructed into sound phrases. Ghosts was the most radical attempt as it didn't have the foundations of Steve and Mick's rhythm section to rest on. That deconstruction of arrangements, along with the beautiful texture of the sound itself is why that album remains a classic.
Manafon is an even more radical, reverse version of that process; the work of a mature artist at his peak. It starts with deconstructed, improvised sound and then works forward to a point where there is just enough song structure for the material to be heard as such. The mental effort involved is frightening. Tin Drum was almost impossibly fragile in its structure, but it did have chords and lyrics to build from. Manafon didn't even have that. It was creating a building without plans and with random pieces and yet still, somehow, managing to take shape and bear the weight of song.