Hi Baht
Just curious, where did you read about the length of the tracks?
S
Simonp wrote:Hi Baht
Just curious, where did you read about the length of the tracks?
S
Blemished wrote:I think that the VofS collection might appeal to people who liked Japan and stopped following David sometime after Brilliant Trees. Not sure E&N ever fitted that bill.
Six One Cynic wrote:Blemished wrote:I think that the VofS collection might appeal to people who liked Japan and stopped following David sometime after Brilliant Trees. Not sure E&N ever fitted that bill.
wow! are there any 'fans' in this community that are really like that? posting in this very thread?
Stephenf wrote:I really do not see the point in something like this being released.
From retro to new i just don't get? As for the comments of people who lost touch with Sylvian during the 80's... that was a choice of the superfluous over the profound. It reminds me of people who discard their religion of birth at a young age only to find in later years a crisis within themselves that needs fulfilling so now they seek forgiveness, a re-birth and a sign that all is well so if the "price is right" come on down.
Also someone please explain how you can map and connect the lines from 'Bamboo' to 'Snow White'. I can just imagine the reaction from a novice sitting down to listen to it, his first experience and he puts the playlist in shuffle mode. As for E&N it was pre Samadhi and bears no relation to the current body of work which is vastly more objective, in- depth, precise and forward thinking both musically and socially than anything he has ever done.
Don't get me wrong here, i loved 'Japan" but that was 30 years ago and i was 14!!!!!!
Blemished wrote:I'm no fan of compilations. In David's case, I'll buy them if they offer either new tracks (Sleepwalkers, VoS), hard to find tracks (E&N) or possibly a unique element of packaging (eg Weatherbox).
The other reason is to support the artist in producing new work - for Samadhisound that is a no brainer - it's more questionable with this, but from other comments it seems David will profit.
But think of it from EMI's point of view. David is a well-respected artist who was a huge star for a period in the early 1980s and with a strong and ongoing catalogue of recordings. Yet he is perhaps less well known than he could be - compared to the likes of Scott Walker, Mark Hollis - and probably sells fewer records as a result.
On purely commercial grounds, therefore, it makes sense for EMI to have a compilation available that might lure in new listeners or those that got lost on the journey. And, as Paul confirms, the latter group do exist. There is also the chance of a new audience in younger listeners who might not have heard of David. If they like the compilation that would probably lead to sales of the EMI-owned albums.
In terms of sequencing, this compilation follows a fairly standard idea - the 'hit' / easier listening on the first disc and the more challenging work on disc two. It provides a way of new fans growing into the later material.
Stephen's point about shuffle listeners is fair enough and maybe more valid for the way younger listeners approach things. Personally speaking though I think it would be really bizarre to play a CD in shuffle mode on first listen.
pn wrote:is this only for sweden?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests